Appalachian State
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
223  Tristin Van Ord JR 20:24
1,023  Hana Ratcliffe SO 21:36
1,087  Dana Cox SR 21:41
1,098  Torre Moser JR 21:42
1,106  Brittany Williams SR 21:42
1,138  Natalie Kile JR 21:45
1,206  Erin Jameson FR 21:49
1,260  Samantha Campanaro SR 21:53
1,266  Ann Sekutowski FR 21:53
1,572  Natalie Andrejchak FR 22:14
1,759  Kate Butler FR 22:26
1,824  Elisa Sargent FR 22:30
1,887  Kerry Leonard SO 22:35
1,928  Mallary Price JR 22:38
1,944  Sarah Hoffert FR 22:39
2,142  Phylissa Greeley SO 22:53
2,159  Shelby Howell SR 22:55
2,577  Leigh Harrow SO 23:34
2,765  Madison Simmons JR 23:58
2,949  Alison Peters SO 24:35
3,027  Christina Shearon SO 24:52
National Rank #133 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #19 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.8%
Top 20 in Regional 87.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tristin Van Ord Hana Ratcliffe Dana Cox Torre Moser Brittany Williams Natalie Kile Erin Jameson Samantha Campanaro Ann Sekutowski Natalie Andrejchak Kate Butler
Upstate Invitational 10/03 1214 22:37 21:52 21:31 21:20 21:53 21:55 21:35 22:16 22:13
Wake Forest Invitational 10/16 1155 20:55 21:34 21:37 21:38 21:24 22:09 21:47 21:10 22:17 22:15 22:45
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/01 1101 20:19 21:38 21:39 21:32 22:24 21:58 21:54
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 1073 20:11 21:39 21:20 21:51 21:51 21:38 22:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.3 487 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.1 1.3 3.0 4.0 6.4 9.1 11.3 13.4 15.4 12.7 9.1 5.5 3.4 1.8 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tristin Van Ord 0.4% 120.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tristin Van Ord 28.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.8 4.5
Hana Ratcliffe 111.4
Dana Cox 120.7
Torre Moser 122.5
Brittany Williams 123.4
Natalie Kile 126.9
Erin Jameson 135.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 1.1% 1.1 10
11 1.3% 1.3 11
12 3.0% 3.0 12
13 4.0% 4.0 13
14 6.4% 6.4 14
15 9.1% 9.1 15
16 11.3% 11.3 16
17 13.4% 13.4 17
18 15.4% 15.4 18
19 12.7% 12.7 19
20 9.1% 9.1 20
21 5.5% 5.5 21
22 3.4% 3.4 22
23 1.8% 1.8 23
24 0.9% 0.9 24
25 0.6% 0.6 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0